Thank you, Greener Chattanooga members, who got my account undeleted

Thank you, everyone who called the city, for getting my Chattanooga Green account reinstated on greenerchattanooga.com. CG has said it will no longer delete the accounts of citizens who request that the 17 Greener Chattanooga groups be made more inclusive, transparent and accessible to citizens. A group representing our government can't legally censor citizens, especially ones asking that more citizens be allowed to participate through Facebook, email blasts and Twitter, since so many of Chattanooga Green meetings are prior to 5p, thus inconvenient.

I hope you will continue asking for this inclusiveness and transparency to combat the perception that many teams are ineffective, have little citizen representation and are steered by corporate citizens seeking government grants, exceptions and incentives!

Unfortunately, my ability to email friends has been blocked, I've been removed from all my teams, and my hours of research and communications on my teams is erased, including all the links and communications with other members. This is unfortunate, since I have been very active, and head more than one subgroup.

However, all of my postings are on the very active citizens' group, Sustainable Chattanooga, on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=40783738010.

I've requested that Chattanooga Green put me on all of the 17 citizen teams.

Here is the blog that got me "banned" for those of you who asked to see it: Making Chattanooga Green's Grass Greener
Would you be more likely to participate in one of the city's 17 Chattanooga Green citizen advisory teams, if you could interact through email, Facebook, Twitter, or a real-time, online meeting?
After all, you shouldn't have to lose your voice or vote on a Chattanooga Green team just because you can't make a meeting time that's set during your work hours.
These teams are tasked with advising the mayor how to steward Chattanooga towards a leadership role in sustainability. And I'd hope having a job or kids wouldn't disable your participation.
Also, to avoid all confusion, I think groups dominated by corporate citizens and city bureaucrats should called "corporate citizen" teams, or lobbying groups, not "citizen" teams.
I realize that corporate citizens and bureaucrats are also citizens, but we can all acknowledge that folks in fields such as development or real estate may be perceived as having a profit or political motive for attending. I've noticed these folks also get compensated for attending the teams as business-related functions, thus are adamant about keeping meetings during work hours.
They also have a an awful lot of pet projects that aren't necessarily in the public good, such as incentives and loopholes for developers, including floating mixed-use development zones that trump the land-use plan.
For the purpose of getting more regular citizens, at least two teams are considering using their entire membership lists (of people who signed up) to get input and votes from those who can't make the meetings. The members could get mass mail outs before and after meetings by email and on the social networking sites, thus give their input or vote from home.
These teams will also try to figure out how to have meetings in real time, online (perhaps Skype). That would make these CG meetings more inclusive and transparent.
As a working person, I can no longer attend three of my 4 Chattanooga Green teams and lobbying groups. I've specifically asked that they include the citizens through email before and after decisions, especially decisions in which the mayor is advised on the public's behalf.
I would hate for Chattanooga Green to be perceived as greenwashing, and be used to advance a corporate or political agenda in the name of the green community.